{"id":306,"date":"2010-11-30T13:49:14","date_gmt":"2010-11-30T18:49:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/?p=306"},"modified":"2011-01-05T12:30:16","modified_gmt":"2011-01-05T17:30:16","slug":"psi-as-a-teachable-moment-on-methods-and-data-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/?p=306","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Psi&#8221; as a teachable moment on methods and data analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In case you haven&#8217;t followed the chatter about Daryl Bem&#8217;s forthcoming paper on evidence of &#8220;precognition&#8221; and &#8220;premonition&#8221; (a.k.a. &#8220;psi&#8221; effects, or more colloquially, psychic intelligence), you can read a synopsis at the Freakonomics blog (<a href=\"http:\/\/freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com\/2010\/11\/29\/are-cornell-students-psychic\/\">link<\/a>). \u00a0The comments on the blog page are quite amusing. \u00a0More interesting is how Wagenmakers et al. have leapt on this as a &#8220;teachable moment&#8221; for discussing perils and pitfalls in commons modes of contemporary data analysis. <!--more--> Their lengthy critique of Bem&#8217;s research (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ruudwetzels.com\/articles\/Wagenmakersetal_subm.pdf\">link<\/a>) is really interesting. \u00a0They discuss fallacies that arise when confirmatory and exploratory analyses are confused. \u00a0They also discuss how a low probability of the data given the null hypothesis ($latex p(D|H_0)$) does not necessarily translate into good reason to<em> <\/em>discontinue belief in the null in favor of some alternative ($latex H_1$). \u00a0Your willingness to increase your belief in the alternative depends on your priors,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">$latex p(H_1|D) = \\frac{p(D|H_1)p(H_1)}{p(D|H_0)p(H_0)+p(D|H_1)p(H_1)}$.<\/p>\n<p>So, if your belief in the null is strong, then even strong evidence against the null can do little to change your beliefs. \u00a0As Wagenmakers et al state, &#8220;[t]his distinction provides the mathematical basis for Laplace\u2019s Principle that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.&#8221; Failure to appreciate this is known as the &#8220;fallacy of the transposed conditional,&#8221; referring to the fallacious consideration of $latex p(D|H)$ as being essentially equivalent to $latex p(H|D)$.\u00a0\u00a0They also discuss a Bayesian method of hypothesis testing that helps to guard against the problem that, with large data, &#8220;everything is significant.&#8221; The method has one examine the relative strength of evidence against the null versus evidence against some clearly specified alternative.\u00a0All of this would make a great introductory case study for methods students.<\/p>\n<p>Update: What Wagenmakers et al call the &#8220;fallacy of the transposed conditional&#8221; is also the basis of Kahnemann and Tversky&#8217;s well-known &#8220;representation heuristic&#8221; (<a href=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/hT99Kr\">link<\/a>).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In case you haven&#8217;t followed the chatter about Daryl Bem&#8217;s forthcoming paper on evidence of &#8220;precognition&#8221; and &#8220;premonition&#8221; (a.k.a. &#8220;psi&#8221; effects, or more colloquially, psychic intelligence), you can read a synopsis at the Freakonomics blog (link). \u00a0The comments on the blog page are quite amusing. \u00a0More interesting is how Wagenmakers et al. have leapt on &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/?p=306\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;&#8220;Psi&#8221; as a teachable moment on methods and data analysis&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=306"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":407,"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions\/407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cyrussamii.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}